New study suggests intermittent fasting may not deliver promised health benefits beyond weight loss, challenging beliefs about time-restricted eating.

Few things get intermittent fasting fans fired up more than debating the “best” schedule. Some people swear it’s better to start your eating window early in the day, while others recommend waiting until later. Now, new research has a verdict: The schedule you follow actually doesn’t seem to matter.

The notion behind intermittent fasting is simple: eat less for a time, improve your metabolism. The reality is more complex, and a new study finds that some forms of intermittent fasting do not alter markers of metabolic or cardiovascular health.

Intermittent fasting has been touted as being good for heart health and longevity, but a new study raises some questions. (Getty Images) The new study calls those touted benefits into question and suggests, for the first time in a major study, that ...

A new study challenges the health claims around intermittent fasting, finding that time-restricted eating does not improve metabolic or cardiovascular health when calorie intake stays the same. The research suggests calorie balance matters more than eating windows.

A new study found that eating fast food is linked to a risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. The disease is when an excess of fat is stored in the liver and it can lead to other complications. When a liver is put under stress as it is with nonalcoholic ...